Thriving through disruption
InsightsLearn how to thrive amid disruption by turning uncertainty into strategic growth and innovation opportunities.

Before designing and executing an optimal hybrid workforce strategy, it’s helpful context to examine various approaches being used in the marketplace to understand the range of options available and their prevalence, given the competition for talent is intense.
Post-pandemic workforce policies have largely coalesced into three categories: full in-person, fully remote, and hybrid.
Full in-person is typically adopted by smaller/regional firms, those whose jobs require them to be on-premise (e.g. manufacturing), or those with influential leaders that feel in-person is critical to success. They’re typically continuing to hire in local markets and relocating individuals to their office/HQ where required.
A fully remote approach is common for digital-first companies or companies that have already been utilizing remote workers or teams spread across locations and time zones prior to the pandemic. Regular business travel and short-term assignments may play an important role here for certain roles, team building, or important project work.
Hybrid workforces are emerging as the most prevalent. This approach attempts to take the best of both models and blend them together. Organizations adopting the hybrid approach may be location agnostic when it comes to hiring and staffing, willing to hire across dispersed markets. But they may also choose to relocate individuals when necessary for business objectives or allow individuals to choose relocation.
As for how organizations are selecting which model to adopt, four organizational mindsets are determining workforce strategy:
No one model has emerged as better or more efficient than the rest. In fact, one can find examples of success and failure within each approach to workforce strategy. And while certain data has shown that employees can be just as, if not more productive while working from home, it’s unclear if that will persist long-term as employees move to different roles, projects, or companies.
Perhaps what’s most important to note is that all models can create employee turnover– as every employee has a model preference and those preferences will almost certainly diverge across employee segments. This might be concerning to hear during the Great Resignation, but there is no way to fully optimize across the board for retention.
The best approach for any organization is 1) to be intentional and strategic with the design of the workforce model and 2) once a decision is made, roll it out in a thoughtful, employee-centric way.
There are three key factors that go into designing a successful hybrid workforce model.
Executing your new workforce modelImplementing a new workforce policy will involve the whole gamut of a business’s operating model: people, processes and technology. But there are a few key factors for implementing a successful remote / hybrid workforce model to keep in mind.
When it comes to hybrid workforces, there’s no putting the genie back in the bottle. For years people were talking about the “future of work,” but due to the COVID-19 pandemic it’s become clear that the future of work is here – and it is one with more remote and distributed workers. Making the shift to a hybrid workforce model won’t be easy for many organizations, but it is a necessary endeavor as employees look for more flexibility and are willing to move companies to get it. By following the guidance above, organizations can develop a workforce strategy that not only meets their needs and goals but also positions them to compete for talent successfully and conduct business in an agile and fluid manner.
Learn how to thrive amid disruption by turning uncertainty into strategic growth and innovation opportunities.
Elias Zoghbi, Technology Leader at Grant Thornton Brazil, analyzes the 10 emerging technologies identified by the WEF and discusses their implementation.
We analyze how the transition in trade can open up space for growth in the middle market, while large companies adopt a cautious stance.